Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-10-19-Resolutions 15-360_Grand Prairie Pkwy - Environmental Services - Engineering Agr Amendment 1THE CITY OF WAUKEE,IOWA RESOLUTION 15-360 APPROVING AN ENGINEERING SERVICES AMENDMENT NO.1 FOR GRAND PRAIRIE PARKWAY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN THE NAME AND BY THE A UTHORITY OF THE CITY OF WA UKEE,IOV'A WHEREAS,the City of Waukee,Dallas County,State of Iowa,is a duly organized Municipal Organization;AND, WHEREAS,on June 16,2014,the Waukee City Council approved an Engineering Services Agreement with Foth Infrastructure and Environment,LLC,for the initial wetland delineation, habitat assessment,and Phase I environmental site assessment for the greenway/regional storm water detention corridor located south of Ashworth Road in the Kettlestone Corridor (Resolution ¹14-164);AND, WHEREAS,the City proposes an Amendment No.I to the Engineering Services Agreement for the completion of a mitigation plan and Section 404 permit application,habitat assessment alternatives analysis,and cultural resource survey;AND, WHEREAS,the engineering services amendment,attached hereto as Exhibit A,has been reviewed and approved by the Waukee City Attorney. NOW THEREFORE BK IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Waukee that the Engineering Services Amendment No.I for Grand Prairie Parkway Environmental Services is hereby approved. Passed by the City Council of the City of Waukee,Iowa,and approved the 19'"day of October, 2015. illia F.Peard,Ma or Attest Rebecca D.Schuett,City Clerk ROLL CALL VOTE Shane Blanchard Brian Harrison Casey L.Harvey Shelly Hughes Rick Peterson AYE X X X X X NAY ABSENT ABSTAIN Fein lnfmsttucture snd Lnvironmsnl,LLC project rturntwr I zvvozz,ot K«aledorr«geveiozrnenl Brand Pr«rrr«P«rkvmy end Avhvonh ffosd Wsukee,lowe ENGINEERING SERVICES AMENDINENT NQ.1 PROJECT NO. girls'gf T THIS AIVIENONIENT,mano and enter«(l mto this ~@ duy uf Sept«mam 2015 by snob«tween lhs CITY OF WAUKEE,IOWA, heremaff m referre to as the "City',and FOTH INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENVIRONbtENT,LLC., II I L *t FM f'.f L 1 llama iv,I x n PjteacLCgigif~aR«sou egurve forthaK«ltlestoneD«vale nnt haratyanendstheoriginal Aqreement dated June 16,2014 as fof lowe: The Ciqy and Engineer agree lo amend the origina-,'Agreement to Include additional services associated with Environmental Permiliing ard include the following tasks: TASK A -INitfgatton Plan and Seclion 404 Permit Application Because wetland and WUS impacts are proposed,the Consultant will prepare and submit a Section 404 P«rmit Application containing the applicable dale,wells«0 luffsdictional mttonaie,and proposed pmjact informatron to ttte USACE„lowe Departmenl of Natural Resoun ss (ID14RI Fioodl Plain Section,and IDIIR Sovereign Lands Seclion, The Consultant will prepare a fdlttgation plan for the project lo address Section 404 pornstting raquiromonts,The pmposed scope of work for the mitigation plan will consist cf phone discussions will t regulatory entities and development of c.plan for wodond ond WUS rupia««mont nr enhancement.The klitiqagon Plan wdl summarize each wedand and wUs area thai will be imps ctod by ihe pr rijor t based cn the Snding s in the wetland Delineation Report and the pmposed site layout pi«n for the project.The mitigabon plan will include a discussion of the functions and values of the delineated wetl«nds compared to the anticipated functions end goals of the mitigatiun sito. Ths Consultant will coorrfinata with the tiSACE to determine whether mibgation al the Voas W«SI«nd Mitigagcn Bank is appropriate based on the lype of impacts that are proposed.Please note thol the mitfgation bank dues nol offer credits for forested or shrubiscrub wetland impacts or for WUS mitigation.If mitigation at the bank is not an acceptable alternative,the Cor su it«nl will coo rdina la with Itto City lo select a suitable on-site or off-site mitigation area.Fees assume that the City will idanbfy locations for wetland mitigalion if it occurs off site.If on-site or off site mgig ation is utilized,the mitigation plan will include an implement«lion plan that disrusses lhe proposed grading,water control atm«lures,buffer areas,and anbcipated hydrology of the lnitiga con area The Consultant will preps e seeding and tree planting gukteiines forthe mitigatmn areas based nn lb«grading plans and anttcipatad hydrology. Th«C«nsuffant will contact the USACE regarding lhe extent of WLI 5 mitigation that wxlt be required and v ill coordmate with lh«City reganiing potential WUS mitigation locations.Wl 'S mibgabon may inc!ude creadrtg ffoodplairis m nparian buffers,constructing habitat Features,channel restoration,streambank stabilization,or rernovai of in-stream structures andror debris,we are proposing to utifize the Missouri stream Miagation Guidance as a guideline for evaluating potential WUS rnitfflstfcn mes«is'es.Fees assume that the City will Iderttify locagons for WUS mitigation if it occurs off-sile, Addidonai fees will be needed if hydraulic modeling is needed fo th«des«In of tho WUS mitigation features, Fees a«sun e that the Cily wiil invesffgate and provide the required financial a«surancos that may be requirod by Ihc USAGE for the project,including constructton bonds and oscrotv accounts.Because ihe City s a public anttty,the USACE may accept a Letter of Commibnent in lieu traditional ffnancial assurances. The City should under«land thai a mitiga:ion plan is a conoeptual design to outline the details of mibgabon activibes proposed fur tha vite for regulatory appmval,lt shuulrl nut be retied upon for conslrut tion.The City shsil understand thol the Consultant cannot guamntea thai the LISACF or other relevant governmental ng«ncies will ufdmatofy approve lhe prepared appbcation,since such authorization is beyo~d tlteir control. Subtotal -SI 5,000,00 Polit lafrast colure arm Environrnanl,LLI' Projsd tt umber 14'r/f 28 01 Kattlsslona Dnvalcpmnn! Gmnd pralfrs parkway and Asnwctsr fiend Vravkas,rows TASK 8-TILE Habitat Assassmsntr Berause sn Individual permit will be required for the project,the UsAOE vAli require sn Allemative Analysis for lhe project tn additton to the Mitrgatron plan.I'he Consultant wifl prepare an Alternative Report that wiii include the fogowing discussions: project purpose ~Prelect Need ~Alternate Sile Analysis Avoidance of tntpact ~Minimization of Impact ~Compensatory Mitigation Tha Alternative Analysis vrilf bo based on dna Irtorttorsndum of yu3roo ment (frlOA I botwr..en tho Environmental Protectkrn Agency IEPA)and lhe Department of the Army concerning the Determination ol IAitigation Under the Clear:tgeter Act Section 404(b)(t)Guidelines,tlaled February 6„'f990.As indicated irt the MOA,when evaluating 404 permit applications,lho USACE follows the steps listed balowt determines that potentiai impacts have been avoided lo the msximur»extent practicable; determines that the remaining unavoidable impacts will than be mitigated to the extenl appropriate and practicable;and cofnpensatos 'for aquatic resource values. Foliowing submiltal of the Alternatives Analysis,the Consultant tall coordinate wrth!he USACF to famlilafe issuance Ot the Section rtoa Permit.The City wilt need lo promda background and supporting information,such as alternate sites evaluated or demographi information.The proposed fees for the atternatives analysis assume that the Cily vill provicfe the Consultant information required tc generals Ihe Aftemattva Analysis report. Subtotal —S10„500.00 TASK C —Phase I Cuttural Resource Survey: Tlm Consultant will retain e subcontractor to perlorm a limited,'cursory archeologrcsl survey for review by the slale Historical Preservalion Mice (SHPOI during tho permitting process,The Phase I investigation will consist of the project area,The task does ncr.Include phase I Cultural Resource surveys g an off-site mdigation sita is aelaclad or phase 9 archaologtca I invastigafi one at the pmject site.The cultural resource survey cannot ba performed when the ground is covered in snow or when frozon ground condrtions exist.The schedule for ttta survey is dependent on weather condilions and the timing of receipl of nolir e to proceed for the pmjact.Fees assume that the phase I Cuituraf Resource Survey will be performed after crops crs removed, Subtotal —S20,000.00 TASK D -Project Meetings: Tha Consuitant will mtain a subcontractor lo pedorm a ltmttwdfcursory archoological survey for review by the Stale Historical PreselVatiOn Office (SHPO)dudnq tha permitttn g process.The Phase I investigation vrIII consist of Pre project area,The task does nol include Phase I Cultural Resource sun eys if an off.site mitigat'on sito is selected or Phase II archeological invesggagons at the project site.The cultural resource sun~ay cannot be performed when the ground is covered in snow or when fro an ground condilions exist.The schedule for the sunray is dependent an weather conditions and Ihc timing of receipt of notice lo proceed for the project.Fees assume that the phase I culturai Rasourco Survey will bo performed after cmps am removed. Su Lntctal —S2,100.00 Folk Infrsstruclum situ Environmenh LI C Protect Number trttu028,01 Ketttdstone trsveiopment Grand Prairie Parkway and nshwunn Road Waukee,lowe In consideration for these services„tlio City agrees to adjust lhe corti pensalion tor services performed by the Engineer, These fees aro ba od on the standard hourly ruNes Of the Eng neer'S Personnef actually engaged in the Performance Of the sendces,plus drrect out-of-pocket costs for expenses incurred by personnel who sre actually engaged in the work and other direct cosLn,The total Cost Plus Nrk loExcsed fees for the prnh ssional engineering aorvir ns ns dnscribnd in this amendment are as follows: I.Basic Services of the Engineer Task A Task S Task C Task D Total $15„000.00 $10,500.00 $20,300,00 2 1M.00 $47,900.00 THIS AivtENDfrlEN is subject to oll pmvisions of the original ytgroomant. THIS AUIENDlrIEhtT,together vrith the criginal Agmemenl,represents the entire and integrated AGRFFMFNT between the City and Engineer TIAIS AIrtENDIvtENT executed the day and year written above. FOTH INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENVIRONSSENT,LLC.CITY OF WAUKEE,IOWA Patrick P.Kueter Ctient Toom t.sorter WITFIESS:ATTEST: Name Dou las J.Ernst.P. T i~I ~Pt di T itl e f' cdm-dndird,ds-ddn.Ãd iudr minrsd3 vrddrddndltldnd'ddt.du„1 dnd Page 3